few hours ago the Constitutional Court revoked the ruling of the Supreme which prevented the Basque nationalist coalition which includes Batasuna, Bildu, stand for the elections on April 22. As always, the most important is not so much that now 'sorry' for the crimes of ETA and neophytes in condemning violence to fight terrorist presence in the councils of the Basque Country, though its importance in the future will prove his importance, and rather, to Euskadi, "but the way in which it has produced and I describe briefly the basis of few brief strokes.
The Prosecutor and the socialist government thought a few days ago that Bildu was part of the fabric of ETA and, as such, are not considered lawful presence in the municipal elections this month. The Supreme Court decision earlier this week, confirming that content, which has pulled himself vice president and head of counterterrorism, Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba, in welcoming the ruling, other colleagues in the Executive also spoke on the same line. Known this ruling, the PNV Iñigo Urkullu announced that the bridges were broken its collaboration with the PSOE party, which would result in the virtual impossibility of Zapatero and his team have a sufficient majority to govern and therefore taking forward the General State Budget for next year. In parallel, seemingly unrelated, voices began to emerge in the PSOE and the government view that the presence of the nationalists in the elections, far from being bad for the democratic system, it was convenient. From there to defend it openly spent a few hours. Yesterday, around midnight, the Constitutional turned the tables and a majority of six votes-those of the judges proposed by the PSOE-five overturned the ruling of the Supreme and opened the door to electoral hearing all of the law of Bildu. A final detail last minute: The above Urkullu, obviously satisfied of this change, says that from now on, "there's a world to build" with the Socialists.
As there are no more fools in this country or the people that before they put their personal touch in each hamlet or village, apologize to draw conclusions, a task I leave to my readers suspected. We
years talking about the politicization of the Justice and its highest authorities have shown in recent time consistent with that belief gneralizada, the result of the war between the major parties to control by the exclusivity that are reserved for appointed members. The Constitutional Court ultimately to the action in Spain, far from being an exception, has proven more controversial as the body incapable of communicating to the public image of independence that their high responsibility and its institutional role granted through of the Constitution. Instead of improving the image, history has not only deteriorated. His latest decision does not appear until a palliative to this statement. And if those are, do we have the English grounds for confidence Justice?
0 comments:
Post a Comment