More and more often, (the years we are becoming more you know) we realize more quickly or at the bottom trying to (or addicted love, oh desperate souls yearning for love) that we have fallen accidentally, or perhaps willing, in a trap that has put the desire , that naughty boy, on our way, to make us believe love when all I wanted was a little sex.
Who of us has not experienced a fleeting relationship be strongly believing in love and discover, if capable of introspection and analysis, it was just about sex? Why the hell are women, lesbian or not, so aim to find the subterfuge of love or infatuation to accommodate the needs of our body?
women Are we made of different material than that of men that keeps us from having sex without any addition? Do we need to spice up our sex life with added romance?
I wonder if this tendency is natural or cultural, even if we weigh the years of Christianity and guilt and can not distinguish between a natural desire for a love like that.
cultural And if not, do we need this addition of being in love to make it valid and enjoyable sex?
Because who has not experienced or heard that happened after the council of the body and satisfy the desire, the veil falls like a curtain and discovered that, where before now converging diverging, or that we face down warning that does not like the person before them, that everything has been a profound mistake (or not, Just ask your body), which unfortunately has been re-attached by a fantasy made by ourselves to feed the passion of the game. Because, suspiciously, this awakening happens always after sex and not before.
we truly change both the way we think about sex, positioning us to take it, conditions us or distraught when we take off as soon as possible the burden of a relationship that goes nowhere?
the record, I do not know the answers, I'm looking for them. But I wonder if it is more sincere, more healthy, especially to prevent emotional exhaustion of breaks, recognized and identified as in need of sex with that distinctive touch of romance and warn that once satisfied it, love may be pledged go because I never was, only just enough to serve as a preamble?
Who of us has not experienced a fleeting relationship be strongly believing in love and discover, if capable of introspection and analysis, it was just about sex? Why the hell are women, lesbian or not, so aim to find the subterfuge of love or infatuation to accommodate the needs of our body?
women Are we made of different material than that of men that keeps us from having sex without any addition? Do we need to spice up our sex life with added romance?
I wonder if this tendency is natural or cultural, even if we weigh the years of Christianity and guilt and can not distinguish between a natural desire for a love like that.
cultural And if not, do we need this addition of being in love to make it valid and enjoyable sex?
Because who has not experienced or heard that happened after the council of the body and satisfy the desire, the veil falls like a curtain and discovered that, where before now converging diverging, or that we face down warning that does not like the person before them, that everything has been a profound mistake (or not, Just ask your body), which unfortunately has been re-attached by a fantasy made by ourselves to feed the passion of the game. Because, suspiciously, this awakening happens always after sex and not before.
we truly change both the way we think about sex, positioning us to take it, conditions us or distraught when we take off as soon as possible the burden of a relationship that goes nowhere?
the record, I do not know the answers, I'm looking for them. But I wonder if it is more sincere, more healthy, especially to prevent emotional exhaustion of breaks, recognized and identified as in need of sex with that distinctive touch of romance and warn that once satisfied it, love may be pledged go because I never was, only just enough to serve as a preamble?
0 comments:
Post a Comment